May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a good alternative to a normal ice cream treat since it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple podsmall.com sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it normally as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, that was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. For this reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have already been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert that allows you to put it into the mouth area, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you may go. If the product also offers an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of regulations. The reason being that while there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.
In addition to the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes in the marketplace could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to younger generations, this could substantially decrease the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not supply them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government may have a point. There’s currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on their products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.